<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=384506&amp;fmt=gif">
Skip to content
{
Book a Demo
    June 4, 2025

    How to Choose the Right ELN or LIMS for Early-Stage Drug Discovery

    Scientists in early-stage drug discovery make a fundamental choice when selecting an Electronic Lab Notebook (ELN) or Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). This decision shapes how your team collaboratively captures organized data,  with inefficient workflows potentially compounding into millions in lost revenue and wastage.

    The best ELN or LIMS platform aligns with your workflows, supports your data integrity requirements, and scales with your research. This guide uses CDD Vault as a reference model for how modern platforms are simplifying complex scientific workflows and provides pros / cons for the leading platforms.

    ChatGPT Image Jun 4, 2025, 10_54_08 AM

    The Value of an ELN/LIMS

    Constant advancements in assays and measurement technology puts increasing pressure on research teams to capture, analyze, and share data quickly and reliably. Paper notebooks, spreadsheets, and siloed systems can’t handle the world of Omics and big data. ELN/LIMS platforms provide a digital core that improves traceability, improves efficiency, and reduces costly errors.

    Key reasons for implementing an ELN/LIMS:

    • Improved Data Integrity: Digital records are more complete, secure, and traceable than paper-based methods.
    • Collaboration Across Teams: Cloud-based platforms support real-time data sharing among scientists, informatics teams, and external collaborators.
    • Integration for Time Savings: Linked records allow for s experiment histories, integrated data capture, and automation to reduce administrative burden.
    • Regulatory Readiness: Properly implemented systems support compliance with GLP, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, and other regulatory frameworks.
    • Scalable Knowledge Management: Your intellectual property becomes a searchable resource that scales with your organization.

    The right ELN/LIMS ensures that critical insights aren’t lost and enables multidisciplinary teams to quickly collect, store, and analyze chemical and biological data to drive innovation. 

    Understanding the Basics

    Before diving into evaluation criteria, it's helpful to distinguish between ELNs and LIMS:

    Feature

    Basic Systems

    (LabArchives, STARLIMS)

    Advanced Platforms 

    (CDD Vault, Benchling)

    Structure drawing

    Limited or external tool

    Integrated cheminformatics toolkit

    Substructure search

    Often unavailable

    Standard feature

    SAR visualization

    Not supported

    Interactive and embedded

    In practice, many organizations benefit from platforms that combine both ELN and LIMS features.

    Criteria to Guide Your Decision

    1. Ease of Use

    The system needs to be intuitive and cleanly designed enabling adoption across multidisciplinary teams. For example, CDD Vault is known for its minimal training requirements and clarity in user interface design, making it approachable for both informatics leads and wet-lab scientists.

    Platforms that feel heavy or require extensive training slows adoption and science. Look for tools that allow users to get up and running in a single session. Ease of use also correlates directly with data completeness; when systems are simple, users enter data more consistently.

    Questions to consider:

    • How much training is required for new users?
    • Can users perform tasks in fewer than three clicks?
    • Are templates and shortcuts available for recurring workflows?
    • Does the platform offer support to train core users and collaborators i.e. CRO’s? 

    2. Structure-Searchable Data

    In medicinal chemistry and biology, the ability to search by chemical structure, allows teams to query molecular properties, substructures, and related biological activity making your data work for you.  Using CDD Vault as an example, here’s a quick comparison of how platforms compare:

    Feature

    Basic Systems

    (LabArchives, STARLIMS)

    Advanced Platforms 

    (CDD Vault, Benchling)

    Structure drawing

    Limited or external tool

    Integrated cheminformatics toolkit

    Substructure search

    Often unavailable

    Standard feature

    SAR visualization

    Not supported

    Interactive and embedded

    Without structure-search capabilities, chemists lose the ability to efficiently mine their own data for insights. The ideal system supports live updates as molecules are drawn and allows visual mapping of structure-activity relationships (SAR).

    Questions to ask vendors:

    • Is chemical structure input native to the platform?
    • Can you search and filter by substructure, exact match, or similarity?
    • Are bioassay results linked to structure data?

    3. Integration and Interoperability

    Modern labs utilize disparate screening instruments, analytics tools, and external databases, potentially leading to inefficient data silos. A flexible API connects these tools into custom workflows. For instance, CDD Vault’s open API connects visualization tools, in-house pipelines, and data lakes to prevent duplicate files, re-entering data, or version control issues with emailing CSVs / PDFs back and forth. Integration is not just a convenience; it’s a multiplier of efficiency.

    Evaluate:

    • Supported integrations (instruments, software)
    • API access and documentation
    • Support for import/export in common formats like SD, CSV, and JSON

    4. Compliance, Security, and Auditability

    Security and compliance features aren’t just for big pharma. Even startups must ensure data integrity, auditability, and regulatory readiness.

    Look for features such as:

    • Role-based access control
    • Electronic signatures
    • Full audit trails
    • 21 CFR Part 11 compliance

    A good ELN/LIMS will also support secure collaboration with CROs and academic partners. Choose a platform that doesn’t force you to choose between openness and compliance.

    Ask:

    • How is data encrypted in transit and at rest?
    • What is your backup and disaster recovery policy?
    • Can we configure permissions at project and user levels?

    5. Handling of Unstructured Data

    Unstructured data plays a critical role in early-stage drug discovery including free-text notes, images (such as gels or spectra), instrument output files, and attached documents like PDFs or Word files. While structured data forms the backbone of reproducible science, unstructured data captures nuance, observations, and human context that are equally essential.

    Not all ELN or LIMS platforms manage unstructured data with the same rigor:

    Platform Type

    Typical Handling of Unstructured Data

    Basic ELNs

    Allow free-text entries and attachments but lack advanced tagging or searchability.

    Traditional LIMS

    Prioritize structured workflows; support attachments, but search and linking capabilities are limited.

    Advanced Platforms
    (e.g., CDD Vault, Benchling)

    Enable document uploads, version control, tagging, and linkage to structured records. Some offer OCR and full-text indexing.

    When evaluating platforms, ask:

    • Can users search across attachments or free-text entries?
    • Is there version control for uploaded documents?
    • Can files and notes be linked to compounds, assays, or protocols?
    • Is OCR (optical character recognition) supported for scanned documents?

    Modern platforms like CDD Vault offer integrated handling of structured and unstructured content-allowing images, notes, and files to be linked directly to relevant compounds or experiments. This makes your scientific data not only richer, but more retrievable and audit-ready.

    6. Scalability and Support

    Early-stage teams expand and pivot, so their data systems must adapt without major overhauls. CDD Vault, for example, offers scalable pricing and infrastructure that supports growth from a single project to enterprise-level collaborations.

    Support is also key. A good vendor provides not just reactive help, but proactive advice-helping you tailor your system to emerging needs.

    Checklist:

    • Is there a limit on the number of users, compounds, or assays?
    • Can we upgrade without replatforming?
    • What onboarding and ongoing support is provided?

    Questions to Ask Any ELN/LIMS Vendor

    To avoid surprises later, teams should ask vendors the following:

    Category

    Key Questions

    Usability

    How long does it take a new user to become productive?

    Chemistry

    Does it support native chemical structure search and drawing?

    Biology

    How does it store and query assay and plate data?

    Integration

    Does it integrate with XYZ instrument or software we already use?

    Compliance

    Is it validated for regulatory requirements like Part 11?

    Support

    What does onboarding include? Is phone/email/chat support available?

    Strengths and Weaknesses Overview

    Each ELN/LIMS platform comes with its own design philosophy, target user base, and specialization. Evaluating their relative strengths and weaknesses is crucial for selecting the best fit for your specific scientific workflows. Some platforms excel in chemistry-first environments, others in biology-heavy settings. Some prioritize scalability and integrations, while others lead with ease of use or academic accessibility. The following table outlines key trade-offs for six commonly used platforms:

    Platform

    Strengths

    Weaknesses

    Benchling

    Modern UI, strong in biology workflows, real-time collaboration

    Can be expensive; less optimized for chemistry workflows

    CDD Vault

    Intuitive design, strong structure-search features, scalable and secure, great for small to midsize teams

    May lack some deep enterprise customizations large pharma require

    Dotmatics

    Comprehensive tools for both chemistry and biology; good visualization

    Complex UI; steeper learning curve; acquisition shifts direction

    LabArchives

    Academic-friendly; simple ELN features

    Limited LIMS features; minimal chemical structure support

    Labguru

    Solid LIMS features, good for lab operations

    Less strong on chemistry-specific capabilities; some usability complaints

    Signals Notebook (Revvity)

    Advanced chemistry tools, strong enterprise features

    High cost; complexity may not suit small teams

    Each of these tools has found traction in specific niches. The best platform depends on your scientific focus, team size, and need for ease vs. depth.

    Pricing and Packaging Overview

    While pricing for ELN/LIMS platforms is often quote-based and varies by deployment size, number of users, and included features, understanding general packaging models can help teams budget effectively and avoid hidden costs.

    Platform

    Pricing Model

    Standalone or Bundled?

    Analysis

    Benchling

    Tiered subscription, per user

    Bundled with platform (includes ELN, molecular biology, registry)

    Higher cost; biology-first; premium features in enterprise tier

    CDD Vault

    Scalable subscription per user/project

    Standalone or integrated with optional ELN module

    Transparent pricing; includes core cheminformatics tools; add-on ELN available as needed

    Dotmatics

    Custom pricing

    Modular; often bundled via acquisition

    Some features may require additional products; bundling varies post-acquisition

    LabArchives

    Low-cost academic pricing; commercial plans available

    Standalone ELN

    Affordable, simple ELN; limited lab operations or chemistry features

    Labguru

    Subscription-based, varies by module

    Bundled with LIMS, inventory, ELN

    Cost grows with feature use; strong lab logistics focus

    Signals Notebook (Revvity)

    Enterprise license or per-seat pricing

    Bundled with cheminformatics suite

    Often part of larger Revvity offering; powerful but complex setup

    Final Thoughts

     

    Choosing a data platform in early-stage discovery is as strategic as it is technical. The ideal system is one your scientists actually want to use-every day. Whether you’re running a small ten-person startup or scaling a growing biotech, prioritize usability, searchability, and flexibility. Platforms like CDD Vault demonstrate that you don’t have to sacrifice power for simplicity.


    The questions you ask now will help future-proof your research and enable discovery that is not just faster - but better.
    If you’re in the process of evaluating platforms, don’t just rely on feature checklists. Talk to peers. Ask for a trial. Try entering a real experiment. The best choice is the one that makes it easier for your science to succeed.

    Tag(s): CDD Blog

    Other posts you might be interested in

    View All Posts
    CDD Blog
    29 min   June 4, 2025
    How to Choose the Right ELN or LIMS for Early-Stage Drug Discovery
    Read More
    CDD Blog
    10 min   June 3, 2025
    Chemical Registration in Drug Discovery
    Read More
    CDD Blog
    6 min   June 3, 2025
    Collaborative Drug Discovery Integrates CDD Vault with NVIDIA BioNeMo NIM For AlphaFold2 and DiffDock Models
    Read More